4. Conclusions
Based on the cooking yield, moisture and fat retention, the
textural profile analysis and sensory evaluation of cooked ground
pork patties added with different additives, effects of GRF are either
better or not significantly different compared with other additives
including CAR, SPI, CS and PS. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude
that 3% of GRF can be effectively used as a functional ingredient in
ground pork patties. The effects may be mainly due to the high
content of amylopectin in GRF, heat gelation during cooking and
the interaction between amylopectin and meat protein. However,
more research is required to investigate the behind mechanism of
GRF on governing the quality of ground meat products and the
synthetic effects of GRF with other additives.
4. Conclusions
Based on the cooking yield, moisture and fat retention, the
textural profile analysis and sensory evaluation of cooked ground
pork patties added with different additives, effects of GRF are either
better or not significantly different compared with other additives
including CAR, SPI, CS and PS. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude
that 3% of GRF can be effectively used as a functional ingredient in
ground pork patties. The effects may be mainly due to the high
content of amylopectin in GRF, heat gelation during cooking and
the interaction between amylopectin and meat protein. However,
more research is required to investigate the behind mechanism of
GRF on governing the quality of ground meat products and the
synthetic effects of GRF with other additives.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..