Iti sreallyhardt oclassifyknowledge

Iti sreallyhardt oclassifyknowledgeinthefieldof
HumanSciences,becauseoftherichnessofperspectivesandorientations,thevarietyofschoolsof
thought,doctrines,individualstandpointsthatevery
disciplineorfieldofresearchi nHumanSciencescan
present.
Consideringnowthesystemofsciencesasa
whole,iti sworthmentioningthepointofviewof
JeanPiaget,oneofthemostsignificantscholarsof
Epistemologyi nthe20'''century,aswellasofPsychology,anddeeplyconcernedwithproblemsofsciencesorganization.
PiagetsignificantlyunderlinedthatwithinthesystemofsciencesHumanSciencesplayacrucialrole,
sincetheyarethesciencesofmanwhodevelopsthe
otherdisciplines.HumanSciencesarei naparticular
epistemologicalsituation,becauseatthesametime
theyareelaboratedbyhumanbeingsandconsider
humanbeingsandtheiractivitiesasanobjectof
study(Piaget1970).InthecaseofHumanSciences,
theobjectofstudyhasconsciousness,though tand
communicationcapability.Therefore,achievementof
objectiveknowledgeandapplicationofexperimental
methodaremoredifficult,sincehumanbeings,in
thecaseofHumanSciences,canaswellinterpretdifferentphenomenathattheyareanalysing,exercising
personalinfluenceontheprocess.PiagetmovedbeyondthetraditionaldualismofstrictschémasasRationalismandEmpiricism,andconsideringepistemologicalconnectionsthatexistamongdifferent
disciplines,assumedadialecticperspectiveandemphasizedthatamongdifferentdisciplinesthereare
mutualrelationsand,insubstance,interdependence
(Piaget1967,1173-1182).
Turningnowt oindexingandclassificationof
knowledgeasmeansofsubjectaccesst oinformation,wecanacknowledgethatinHumanandSocial
Sciencesitdoesnotexistonlyonewayt orepresent

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 1:

เผอิญ sreallyhardt oclassifyknowledgeinthefieldof
humansciences,becauseoftherichnessofperspectivesandorientations,thevarietyofschoolsof
thought,doctrines,individualstandpointsthatevery
disciplineorfieldofresearchi ปัจจุบัน nhumansciencescan
.

consideringnowthesystemofsciencesasa ทั้งเผอิญ sworthmentioningthepointofviewof jeanpiaget
,
oneofthemostsignificantscholarsof epistemologyi nthe20'' 'ศตวรรษที่การศึกษา (piaget1970). inthecaseofhumansciences
theobjectofstudyhasconsciousness แม้ว่า tand
communicationcapability.therefore,achievementof
objectiveknowledgeandapplicationofexperimental
methodaremoredifficult,sincehumanbeings,in
thecaseofhumansciences,canaswellinterpretdifferentphenomenathattheyareanalysing,exercising
personalinfluenceontheprocess.piagetmovedbeyondthetraditionaldualismofstrictschémasasrationalismandempiricism,andconsideringepistemologicalconnectionsthatexistamongdifferent
disciplines,assumedadialecticperspectiveandemphasizedthatamongdifferentdisciplinesthereare
mutualrelationsand,insubstance,interdependence
(piaget1967,1173-1182).
turningnowt oindexingandclassificationof
knowledgeasmeansofsubjectaccesst oinformation,wecanacknowledgethatinhumanandsocial
sciencesitdoesnotexistonlyonewayt orepresent

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 2:

ตัล sreallyhardt oclassifyknowledgeinthefieldof
HumanSciences, becauseoftherichnessofperspectivesandorientations, thevarietyofschoolsof
ความคิด อยู่ individualstandpointsthatevery
disciplineorfieldofresearchi nHumanSciencescan
ปัจจุบัน.
Consideringnowthesystemofsciencesasa
sworthmentioningthepointofviewof ตัลทั้งหมด
JeanPiaget, oneofthemostsignificantscholarsof
Epistemologyi nthe20'' ' ศตวรรษaswellasofPsychology, anddeeplyconcernedwithproblemsofsciencesorganization.
PiagetsignificantlyunderlinedthatwithinthesystemofsciencesHumanSciencesplayacrucialrole,
sincetheyarethesciencesofmanwhodevelopsthe
otherdisciplinesHumanSciencesarei naparticular
epistemologicalsituation, becauseatthesametime
theyareelaboratedbyhumanbeingsandconsider
humanbeingsandtheiractivitiesasanobjectof
study(Piaget1970)InthecaseofHumanSciences,
theobjectofstudyhasconsciousness ว่า tand
communicationcapabilityดังนั้น achievementof
objectiveknowledgeandapplicationofexperimental
methodaremoredifficult, sincehumanbeings ใน
thecaseofHumanSciences, canaswellinterpretdifferentphenomenathattheyareanalysing ออกกำลังกาย
personalinfluenceontheprocessPiagetmovedbeyondthetraditionaldualismofstrictschémasasRationalismandEmpiricism, andconsideringepistemologicalconnectionsthatexistamongdifferent
สาขา assumedadialecticperspectiveandemphasizedthatamongdifferentdisciplinesthereare
mutualrelationsand, insubstance,
(Piaget1967,1173-1182) อิสระเสรี
Turningnowt oindexingandclassificationof
knowledgeasmeansofsubjectaccesst oinformationwecanacknowledgethatinHumanandSocial
Sciencesitdoesnotexistonlyonewayt orepresent

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 3:

ITI ผลิตภัณฑ์ ไร้สาย Premises sreallyhardt oclassifyknowledgeinthefieldof
HumanSciences,becauseoftherichnessofperspectivesandorientations,thevarietyofschoolsof
thought,doc nhumansciencescan
ปัจจุบัน.

consideringnowthesystemofsciencesasa ทั้งหมด, ITI ผลิตภัณฑ์ ไร้สาย Premises sworthmentioningthepointofviewof
jeanpiaget , oneofthemostsignificantscholarsof
epistemologyi N 20 "' แห่งศตวรรษ,aswellasofPsychology,anddeeplyconcernedwithproblemsofsciencesorganization.
Piagetsignificantlyunderlinedthatwithinthesystemofsci naparticular
epistemologicalsituation,becauseatthesametime
theyareelaboratedbyhumanbeingsandconsider
humanbeingsandtheiractivitiการศึกษา( Piaget 1970 ) inthecaseofhumansciences ,
theobjectofstudyhasconsciousness ,แม้ว่า tand
communicationcapability.Therefore,achievementof
objectiveknowledgeandapplicationofexperimental
methodaremoredifficult,sincePiagetmovedbeyondthetraditionaldualismofstrictschémasasRationalismandEmpiricism,andconsideringepistemologicalconnectionsthatexi oindexingandclassificationof
knowledgeasmeansofsubjectaccesst oinformation ,wecanacknowledgethatinhumanandsocial orepresent
sciencesitdoesnotexistonlyonewayt