The results of these studies have come to different conclu- sions: some claim positive evidence while others claim negative evidence. Some studies that have been used as evi- dence in the debate have not investigated the task of silent reading (e.g., ‘‘reading’’ lists of words, Dimigen, Kliegl, & Sommer, 2012) and, because the nature of the task is differ- ent from that of silent reading, will not be considered here. The perspective in the present paper is not to provide yet another piece of evidence to weigh on one side or another, but rather to attempt to reconcile various studies showing different results. I first discuss past studies on semantic pre- view benefit and develop a conceptual framework in which to reconcile them.
The results of these studies have come to different conclu- sions: some claim positive evidence while others claim negative evidence. Some studies that have been used as evi- dence in the debate have not investigated the task of silent reading (e.g., ‘‘reading’’ lists of words, Dimigen, Kliegl, & Sommer, 2012) and, because the nature of the task is differ- ent from that of silent reading, will not be considered here. The perspective in the present paper is not to provide yet another piece of evidence to weigh on one side or another, but rather to attempt to reconcile various studies showing different results. I first discuss past studies on semantic pre- view benefit and develop a conceptual framework in which to reconcile them.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
