Another suggestion given by Dornyei (2010: 257) is the concept of “the ideal L2 self” that “is the central component of a new conceptualization of L2 motivation.” However, it will only be effective if: (1) “the learner has a desired future self-image;” and (2) it is “accompanied by relevant and effective procedural strategies that act as a roadmap towards the goal.” The subjects of this study may have their desired future self-image but it is hard to say that they have had a “roadmap towards their goals.” It remains as a question: how do EFL instructors help students make “effective procedural strategies”? Or do students have to be autonomous and work without their instructors’ assistance.
This paper concludes by suggesting the study of motivation and language learning activities might best be pursued in the context of research on learner autonomy. Autonomous learners are considered to understand the purpose of learning, accept responsibility for their learning and take initiatives in planning and conducting learning activities. What intrigues here is how learner autonomy is related to learner’s motivation. In other words the question is whether high motivation leads one to attain more autonomy, resulting in better achievement of one’s learning goals. Further study should shed light on learner’s motivation as psychological factor and its effect on the level of learner autonomy.