drawn to follow-up behavioral measures. Standardized path coefficients are reported with their associated significance levels. In addition to evaluating the individual paths, we tested the overall fit of the model to the data. The comparative fit index (CFI, Maximum Likelihood ML χ2 ) and the Root Mean Square Errors of Approximation (RMSEA) were both used as indicators of fit. The CFI indicates the proportion of improvement in the overall fit of the hypothesized model relative to a null model in which all covariances between variables are zero. Values of .95 or greater are desirable for the CFI and indicate an excellent fit of the model to the data. The RMSEA is helpful as an additional tool to evaluate fit because it indicates the size of the residuals, values less than .06 indicate a relatively good fit.