I have a question.
As per our business agreement on the meeting between Riken , Kamekyu and Konoike that
the response of service transportation for AIR shipment 4W, 6W and 10W( LCL) are by Kamekyu truck.
So in quotation of Kamekyu offer to Riken, the transportation price are the special cheap rate of Kamekyu.
It unacceptable for Kamekyu to pay in rate 2,500 B./trip while we can charge to Riken only 1,476 B./ trip.
On Dec. we found your INV. about AIR shipment total 5 shipment.
It's mean Kamekyu will be loss 1,024B./trip and total loss around 5,120B.
(Please find the attachment)
Why the actual operation, Konoike not use Kamekyu's truck and charge full rate of Konoike price?
Please urgently clear about this problem, now we can not issue INV to Riken kha.
I have a question.
As per our business agreement on the meeting between Riken , Kamekyu and Konoike that
the response of service transportation for AIR shipment 4W, 6W and 10W( LCL) are by Kamekyu truck.
So in quotation of Kamekyu offer to Riken, the transportation price are the special cheap rate of Kamekyu.
It unacceptable for Kamekyu to pay in rate 2,500 B./trip while we can charge to Riken only 1,476 B./ trip.
On Dec. we found your INV. about AIR shipment total 5 shipment.
It's mean Kamekyu will be loss 1,024B./trip and total loss around 5,120B.
(Please find the attachment)
Why the actual operation, Konoike not use Kamekyu's truck and charge full rate of Konoike price?
Please urgently clear about this problem, now we can not issue INV to Riken kha.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
