it can be seen that, irrespective of their nationality and intended subject of study, student in Group B, which used the computer assisted facilities, performed significantly better than their non computer-assisted peers all five subsections of the test by more than two to one in terms of scores attained in each of the subcategories. For example, in task achievement subcategory, Group B scored an average of 80 percent, while Group A students scored an average of 14 percent. Clearly, the findings indicate that the time spent using the UEfAP website had a positive effect on student performance. It appears that the use of computer assisted on learning programs for at least some of the teaching time available resulted in substantial differences in performance in all five categories of the university. It it to be hoped that this improvement will transfer to the student's written performance in their main subject courses.