The knowledge translation priority of partners was providing key messages
to assist those involved with existing policy, programs, and practices, to better address survivor needs. Partner direction guided the broader feasibility analysis of interviews,
meeting notes, and charts. Still, some researchers struggled with the extent to which lessons from the New Brunswick , Intervention for Health Enhancement After Leaving would
be applicable to other programs, arguing that findings were an outcome of the NB iHEAL as a whole and could not be assured with implementation only of selected pieces. Ongoing
data analysis, continuing dialogue among researchers, interventionists, and partners, and community forums helped to reconcile these tensions and gradually led to identification
of broader lessons.