Alternative Solutions
1. They can both share the risk.
Consideration to Choose methods that should be done to manage the risks that may occur, which to consider the probability and impact that will occur. The risk-sharing or sharing the benefits from the negotiations. Both parties will be affected equally, if the benefits would be shared. Without necessarily leading to a winner-loser can win all the parties together, but a win was to live together sustainably. This is how to manage risk in the the exchange rate settlement negotiations between Japan and the United States.
2. The foreign partner assumes the risk.
All Company are looking to avoid risk all together. Risks of international business difficult to avoid is the currency exchange rate. The pushed burden of risk to partners is to define the international currency trading from yen into dollars. The risk of fluctuations in currency will be pushed burden to partners instead. The partners may turn to do business with a competitor instead. Because this solution aims to overcome. Think the interests of the self-parties but do not think disadvantage of other parties.
3. Your side assumes the risk.
In trading with foreign countries. The most buyers have to pay foreign currency to the exporter and it is normal of international trade transactions. So In business must faced with the risk of exchange rate. That can change the value at any time by difficult to avoid. There is a solution of your side assumes the risk is If company have income and expenditure in foreign currencies of the same currency. We can take advantage of the Foreign Currency deposit : FCD by bringing the money in foreign currency to pay for the values in the same currency without converted back into dollars anyhow. This method will not disadvantage us in exchange rates or Swap. It is the easiest way to avoid risks.
4. One or both parties stipulate in the contract that the currency denomination is an area open to renegotiation, allowing for a certain percentage of rate fluctuation to occur.
Companies in Japan and the the United States companies agreed to accept the contract risks arising from the exchange of currency by a determining the percentage of change that may occur. Then one of the companies determine the percentage of risk that is acceptable. Excess of the risk that one of the companies recognized. Another company to accept the rest.
The solution is the best way to 1) They can both share the risk. Called the agreement a "win-win" for both. In a typical business negotiation, we may think of the interests of the parties themselves. But for a Win-Win agreement, we should look at the benefits of both. We should decide way to use the benefits that both sides agree as well. When the agreement is likely that we will lose too many benefits, try to find the reason before. After find the cause was then analyzed to find a solution to the problem in order to meet both parties. Although benefits may not as much as we negotiated to take advantage more. But the result may return back than we thought. We may have come a long term partner that is ready to cooperate, help solve business problems and ready to be a good partner for a long time in the future.
Therefore good negotiation must be planned process of dialogue, study areas, and the representative in the negotiations. It allows for efficient and successful negotiations by easier.
Alternative Solutions1. They can both share the risk. Consideration to Choose methods that should be done to manage the risks that may occur, which to consider the probability and impact that will occur. The risk-sharing or sharing the benefits from the negotiations. Both parties will be affected equally, if the benefits would be shared. Without necessarily leading to a winner-loser can win all the parties together, but a win was to live together sustainably. This is how to manage risk in the the exchange rate settlement negotiations between Japan and the United States.2. The foreign partner assumes the risk. All Company are looking to avoid risk all together. Risks of international business difficult to avoid is the currency exchange rate. The pushed burden of risk to partners is to define the international currency trading from yen into dollars. The risk of fluctuations in currency will be pushed burden to partners instead. The partners may turn to do business with a competitor instead. Because this solution aims to overcome. Think the interests of the self-parties but do not think disadvantage of other parties.3. Your side assumes the risk. In trading with foreign countries. The most buyers have to pay foreign currency to the exporter and it is normal of international trade transactions. So In business must faced with the risk of exchange rate. That can change the value at any time by difficult to avoid. There is a solution of your side assumes the risk is If company have income and expenditure in foreign currencies of the same currency. We can take advantage of the Foreign Currency deposit : FCD by bringing the money in foreign currency to pay for the values in the same currency without converted back into dollars anyhow. This method will not disadvantage us in exchange rates or Swap. It is the easiest way to avoid risks.4. One or both parties stipulate in the contract that the currency denomination is an area open to renegotiation, allowing for a certain percentage of rate fluctuation to occur. Companies in Japan and the the United States companies agreed to accept the contract risks arising from the exchange of currency by a determining the percentage of change that may occur. Then one of the companies determine the percentage of risk that is acceptable. Excess of the risk that one of the companies recognized. Another company to accept the rest. The solution is the best way to 1) They can both share the risk. Called the agreement a "win-win" for both. In a typical business negotiation, we may think of the interests of the parties themselves. But for a Win-Win agreement, we should look at the benefits of both. We should decide way to use the benefits that both sides agree as well. When the agreement is likely that we will lose too many benefits, try to find the reason before. After find the cause was then analyzed to find a solution to the problem in order to meet both parties. Although benefits may not as much as we negotiated to take advantage more. But the result may return back than we thought. We may have come a long term partner that is ready to cooperate, help solve business problems and ready to be a good partner for a long time in the future. Therefore good negotiation must be planned process of dialogue, study areas, and the representative in the negotiations. It allows for efficient and successful negotiations by easier.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
