Although Pelletier and Bligh (2006) did not intend for the PELs to be used solely as a measure of top and immediate leader ethics, the subscales demonstrated desirable psychometric properties: good reliabilities a convergent validity with relevant organizational attitudes interest, these two the show promise for investigating employee perceptions of top leader and immediate supervisor integrity, adding an additional scale to the available measures (e.g., the PLIS Craig and Gustafson 1998, and ELS, Brown et al. 2005).review, is that impressions management on the part of top leaders is necessary but not sufficient to convince organizational members that they are ethical. Working with an immediate supervisor gives a definitive assessment of his or her ethical behavior