The eight attributes are interconnected; for example, there can be no
accountability without transparency and the rule of law, and no consensus
without participation. Overall, the assessment concluded that governance was
“good enough”, especially given the national health policy context characterized
by the lack of a well-functioning national health authority, the MOPH’s monopoly
of public health facilities and the shortage of health-care professionals. Some
highlights of the results are presented below, including areas of concern. More
details along with the definition of each attribute can be found in the governance
background paper available at www.hsri.or.th.
The equitable and inclusive attribute has already been demonstrated in this report.
A long-term commitment to equitable distribution of resources indicates strong
commitment of the central governing bodies to the equity goal of the UCS. One
example was the NHSO’s decision to allocate extra budget to remote areas,
ensuring availability of services to disadvantaged populations.