Enclosed here with this e mail , all of you will find the report and the action to be taken from your dept to comply with internal audit report and recommendation.
Please comply the action with the " Management response " which kindly report the progress on monthly basis.
The follow up on the action will be shown in monthly MCM report.
the proposal
Priority Ranking
From our review of the spare parts management process, SOD conflict was noted for issuing spare parts to the Engineers. At the present, the Store Keepers were responsible for issuing parts to the Engineers and also keying transactions into the Oracle system without independent review of th
Annual maintenance plan for each machine (i.e. Key cranes, yard cranes and trucks) is scheduled from Excel (named “MERSK”) which prepared by the Engineering Department.
Based on our review of the work orders issued during August 2014 to July 2015, we noted the following:
Lack of punctuality of maintenance activities could lead to machinery breakdown resulting in business disruption.
The daily/weekly meeting between Engineering and Operations department should be arranged to consider/update the below matters:
A schedule for the upcoming week/month and work orders (WOs) for every job is offered. This assures that operations can stop the machines/equipment on decided time and that all WOs are well planned.
Solve scheduling conflicts, if there are any.
If the delays were caused by waiting for a part of equipment, the Engineer should identify the parts that require more than 2-3 days to obtain are an important part and need to be stored.
Engineer should revisit the current maintenance plan/cycle check of the particular machine and consider whether it is still valid for the current practice/circumstance/manpower. In addition, critical activities should be defined and these activities should be strictly performed in line with plan.
Requested, returned, critical spare parts and work order priorities processes were not addressed in the procedure
Based on our review of the maintenance and spare parts management processes, we noted that there were no procedures for the following areas:
Currently, the spare parts requisition forms (which require user to identify the cost center) were sent to the Store Keepers who issued parts to the Engineers and key data (including cost center/machine) into the system based on the forms. However, inconsistent practice was noted since the following various practices were made:
Enclosed here with this e mail , all of you will find the report and the action to be taken from your dept to comply with internal audit report and recommendation.Please comply the action with the " Management response " which kindly report the progress on monthly basis.The follow up on the action will be shown in monthly MCM report.the proposalPriority RankingFrom our review of the spare parts management process, SOD conflict was noted for issuing spare parts to the Engineers. At the present, the Store Keepers were responsible for issuing parts to the Engineers and also keying transactions into the Oracle system without independent review of thAnnual maintenance plan for each machine (i.e. Key cranes, yard cranes and trucks) is scheduled from Excel (named “MERSK”) which prepared by the Engineering Department.Based on our review of the work orders issued during August 2014 to July 2015, we noted the following:Lack of punctuality of maintenance activities could lead to machinery breakdown resulting in business disruption.The daily/weekly meeting between Engineering and Operations department should be arranged to consider/update the below matters:A schedule for the upcoming week/month and work orders (WOs) for every job is offered. This assures that operations can stop the machines/equipment on decided time and that all WOs are well planned.Solve scheduling conflicts, if there are any.If the delays were caused by waiting for a part of equipment, the Engineer should identify the parts that require more than 2-3 days to obtain are an important part and need to be stored.Engineer should revisit the current maintenance plan/cycle check of the particular machine and consider whether it is still valid for the current practice/circumstance/manpower. In addition, critical activities should be defined and these activities should be strictly performed in line with plan.Requested, returned, critical spare parts and work order priorities processes were not addressed in the procedureBased on our review of the maintenance and spare parts management processes, we noted that there were no procedures for the following areas:Currently, the spare parts requisition forms (which require user to identify the cost center) were sent to the Store Keepers who issued parts to the Engineers and key data (including cost center/machine) into the system based on the forms. However, inconsistent practice was noted since the following various practices were made:
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""