The physical activity markers (high, medium, and low MET intensity) were spatially intersected with parks located in the Council area and cross-tabulated. There was a statistically significant association (X2 = 440.1, df = 12, p < 0.001) between the intensity of
physical activities and the urban park type (Table 3). The largest percentage of high intensity physical activity (about 60%) is associated with linear parks while the largest percentages of low intensity physical activity are associated with community parks (about 40%) and neighbourhood parks (about 23%). From the standardized chi-square residuals, low intensity physical activity is disproportionately associated with neighbourhood and community parks, while high intensity physical activity is disproportionately associated with linear parks and areas outside of park boundaries. Asmight be expected, low intensity physical activity is underrepresented in sports parks.
The physical activity markers (high, medium, and low MET intensity) were spatially intersected with parks located in the Council area and cross-tabulated. There was a statistically significant association (X2 = 440.1, df = 12, p < 0.001) between the intensity ofphysical activities and the urban park type (Table 3). The largest percentage of high intensity physical activity (about 60%) is associated with linear parks while the largest percentages of low intensity physical activity are associated with community parks (about 40%) and neighbourhood parks (about 23%). From the standardized chi-square residuals, low intensity physical activity is disproportionately associated with neighbourhood and community parks, while high intensity physical activity is disproportionately associated with linear parks and areas outside of park boundaries. Asmight be expected, low intensity physical activity is underrepresented in sports parks.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""