Several limitations of this study that need further attention in the future should be
noted. First, because all of the measures used are self-reported, common method
variance due to single-source bias is a problem and may have inflated the magnitude
of the relationships found. Second, the relatively small sample used for this study
may limit the generalizability of the results. Third, this study only focused on the
individual level to investigate the relationship between CMS and individual
outcomes; future studies should focus on different levels, such as the team level,
to investigate the relationships among CMS, trust, and team outcomes. Future
research is also needs to examine the influence of national or corporate culture on
the proposed relationships, and other mediators, such as trust in the organization or
trust in co-workers, should also be explored. Finally, this study suggests a unique
kind of trust, which exists under the paternalistic leadership style of Chinese culture
and which has not been captured in the dimensions of trust, both affective and
cognitive, in the previous trust literature. Future research in this area is necessary to
enhance our understanding of trust in leadership.
Several limitations of this study that need further attention in the future should benoted. First, because all of the measures used are self-reported, common methodvariance due to single-source bias is a problem and may have inflated the magnitudeof the relationships found. Second, the relatively small sample used for this studymay limit the generalizability of the results. Third, this study only focused on theindividual level to investigate the relationship between CMS and individualoutcomes; future studies should focus on different levels, such as the team level,to investigate the relationships among CMS, trust, and team outcomes. Futureresearch is also needs to examine the influence of national or corporate culture onthe proposed relationships, and other mediators, such as trust in the organization ortrust in co-workers, should also be explored. Finally, this study suggests a uniquekind of trust, which exists under the paternalistic leadership style of Chinese cultureand which has not been captured in the dimensions of trust, both affective andcognitive, in the previous trust literature. Future research in this area is necessary toenhance our understanding of trust in leadership.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..