A small group of 15 samples (11.8% of the total) slightly separatedfrom the rest of the samples, with values ranging from 2.76 to 3.50
(around medium quality) was observed.
With respect to texture, scores are distributed more widely than
for odor, ranging from 1.38 to 4.75. There is a differentiated group
of 13 samples (10.2% of the samples) with a mean score lower than
2, clearly related to defective characteristics.
The interval from 2.76 to 3.50 accounts for almost half of the samples (47.3%), which correspond
to a medium quality. Finally, 22.8% of the samples was scored
between 3.76 and 4.75, considered as of high or very high quality
regarding texture.
These data show that texture is a parameter that
clearly differentiates among the samples.
A small group of 15 samples (11.8% of the total) slightly separatedfrom the rest of the samples, with values ranging from 2.76 to 3.50
(around medium quality) was observed.
With respect to texture, scores are distributed more widely than
for odor, ranging from 1.38 to 4.75. There is a differentiated group
of 13 samples (10.2% of the samples) with a mean score lower than
2, clearly related to defective characteristics.
The interval from 2.76 to 3.50 accounts for almost half of the samples (47.3%), which correspond
to a medium quality. Finally, 22.8% of the samples was scored
between 3.76 and 4.75, considered as of high or very high quality
regarding texture.
These data show that texture is a parameter that
clearly differentiates among the samples.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..