Hoskins2 also opposed the concept of synonymy between forensic
and legal medicine, intimating that forensic medicine was easily
definable as a medical specialty while he considered legal
medicine to be too disparate to warrant specialty recognition. His
suggestion was that legal medicine incorporated too many diverse
areas in clinical medicine, such as the variety of medical specialties
(as is covered by Colleges of Physicians), the range of surgeons
(with their own Colleges), reproductive medicine (with the various
Colleges of Obstetrics and Gynaecology) and so forth. Such argument
lacks credibility if one focuses on just one of the colleges,
such as the Colleges of Physicians (for example the Royal College
of Physicians or the Royal Australasian College of Physicians),
which issue specialist qualifications in medicine, identified as FRCP
Hoskins2 also opposed the concept of synonymy between forensic
and legal medicine, intimating that forensic medicine was easily
definable as a medical specialty while he considered legal
medicine to be too disparate to warrant specialty recognition. His
suggestion was that legal medicine incorporated too many diverse
areas in clinical medicine, such as the variety of medical specialties
(as is covered by Colleges of Physicians), the range of surgeons
(with their own Colleges), reproductive medicine (with the various
Colleges of Obstetrics and Gynaecology) and so forth. Such argument
lacks credibility if one focuses on just one of the colleges,
such as the Colleges of Physicians (for example the Royal College
of Physicians or the Royal Australasian College of Physicians),
which issue specialist qualifications in medicine, identified as FRCP
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
