43 An entity shall account for a state plan in the same way as for a multi-employer plan
(see paragraphs 32–39).
44 State plans are established by legislation to cover all entities (or all entities in a particular
category, for example, a specific industry) and are operated by national or local government
or by another body (for example, an autonomous agency created specifically for this purpose)
that is not subject to control or influence by the reporting entity. Some plans established by an
entity provide both compulsory benefits, as a substitute for benefits that would otherwise be
covered under a state plan, and additional voluntary benefits. Such plans are not state plans.
45 State plans are characterised as defined benefit or defined contribution, depending on the
entity’s obligation under the plan. Many state plans are funded on a pay-as-you-go basis:
contributions are set at a level that is expected to be sufficient to pay the required benefits
falling due in the same period; future benefits earned during the current period will be paid out
of future contributions. Nevertheless, in most state plans the entity has no legal or
constructive obligation to pay those future benefits: its only obligation is to pay the
contributions as they fall due and if the entity ceases to employ members of the state plan, it
will have no obligation to pay the benefits earned by its own employees in previous years. For
this reason, state plans are normally defined contribution plans. However, when a state plan
is a defined benefit plan an entity applies paragraphs 32–39.
Insured benefits
46 An entity may pay insurance premiums to fund a post-employment benefit plan. The
entity shall treat such a plan as a defined contribution plan unless the entity will have
(either directly, or indirectly through the plan) a legal or constructive obligation either:
(a) to pay the employee benefits directly when they fall due; or
(b) to pay further amounts if the insurer does not pay all future employee benefits
relating to employee service in the current and prior periods.
If the entity retains such a legal or constructive obligation, the entity shall treat the plan
as a defined benefit plan.
47 The benefits insured by an insurance policy need not have a direct or automatic relationship
with the entity’s obligation for employee benefits. Post-employment benefit plans involving
insurance policies are subject to the same distinction between accounting and funding as
other funded plans.
48 Where an entity funds a post-employment benefit obligation by contributing to an insurance
policy under which the entity (either directly, indirectly through the plan, through the
mechanism for setting future premiums or through a related party relationship with the insurer)
retains a legal or constructive obligation, the payment of the premiums does not amount to a
defined contribution arrangement. It follows that the entity:
(a) accounts for a qualifying insurance policy as a plan asset (see paragraph 8); and
(b) recognises other insurance policies as reimbursement rights (if the policies satisfy the
criterion in paragraph 116).