Participants’ attitudes toward the development strategy, design approach, managerial operation, and financial demand of the Bos Park varied. Participants expressed a high level of consent to the park’s development strategy, ecological function prior to recreational function. This result was consistent with the findings of other studies in recent years (Chen, 2011). Participants also strongly agreed to the park’s design approach and the managerial operation. The results reflect that participants understood that the design approach could directly put ecological concepts into practice and the managerial operation could sustain the park’s ecosystem. However, they did not have strong consent for several items of the design approach and the managerial operation. To a certain extent, this phenomenon reflects that participants might not yet have completely left behind the conventional design and managerial methods implemented in the parks in Taiwan. Perhaps they still looked forward to a rapidly designed park with colorful flowery plants, and a large number of recreational facilities, all requiring intensive care. As for the financial demand, participants somewhat consented to the reduction of the total costs due to the decreased input of manpower and expense in managing a forest park. Such a finding could be explained by participants’ concern that some parks in Taiwan often cannot receive lasting maintenance. This situation often leads to a gradual decline in quality due to the government’s financial problems (Lee, 2004). This suggests that survey participants did not fully understand the low maintenance benefits provided by the natural systems design approach.