Introduction: Misunderstanding about Space
In projecting the future development of the world economy, mainstream economists fail to foresee a major part of the coming decades' economic activity because they suffer from a major misunderstanding about space activities that is unfortunately widespread both outside and inside the "space industry". This misunderstanding is held also by leading contemporary historians such as Samuel Huntington (1) and Francis Fukuyama (2), by leading contemporary sociologists such as Alvin Toffler(3), and by well-known economic commentators such as Robert Heilbroner (4) and Jeremy Rifkin (5).
(This misunderstanding might perhaps be called the " Player Piano Error" after the 1952 novel by the author Kurt Vonnegut (6): this describes an apparently plausible but economically unrealistic future condition of the USA in which most of the population is unemployed, spending their lives comfortable but bored on government "make work" schemes, while a small elite manage the highly automated industry that produces goods and services for everyone.)
The mistake underlying these writers' view of the future is the assumption that ordinary people cannot go to space. They believe that it is almost impossibly difficult to get to space, and that only specially selected people with extensive training can survive the "rigours" of space travel. Consequently they assume that space activities will remain trivially small in scale, and that humans' future will be essentially Earth-bound.
This idea is entirely mistaken: in fact it is not very difficult to travel to space - it has been done regularly for nearly 40 years (ie since before such basic features of modern life as satellite communications, colour television, Beatles' music, the Boeing 747, oral contraceptives, credit-cards, video-cassettes, heart pacemakers, micro-computers, microwave ovens, compact discs, optical fibres, the Internet, DNA finger-printing, mobile telephones, GPS and many others); and essentially anyone can travel to and from space without any stress or ill-effects.
Because of these facts, commercial space travel services can grow in future essentially without limit; and they are likely do so once private businesses start to earn profits from them, due to the very large unsatisfied demand for these services - as has recently begun to receive official recognition. This development will have a profound effect on the world economy and on human activities over the next few decades, making the visions of the future described by most economic commentators to date, including those mentioned above, seriously inaccurate.
1.1 Space Tourism Feasible
The main reason why passenger travel services to and from space are not available today is not because they are difficult or even particularly expensive to develop, at least by comparison with current government budgets for civilian space activities - but because government space agencies are not trying to develop them - although they spend $25 billion/year of taxpayers' money. As an example, the largest space agency, NASA, has the " X-33" reusable rocket under development, but it is unpiloted; its intended successor, "Venture Star", is not suitable for passenger-carrying; and it represents barely 2% of NASA's budget. Furthermore, government space agencies have never carried out market research on the demand for space travel services among the general public.
Because of the lack of research on the feasibility of tourism in space, the Japanese Rocket Society ( JRS), a private organisation established in 1956, started a formal "Space Tourism Study Programme" in 1993. A series of papers and reports on the results of this work has been published (7), of which major conclusions to date include:
the " Kankoh-maru" VTOL launch vehicle could carry 50 passengers to and from low Earth orbit at a price of some $25,000/passenger, and could be developed and put into commercial operation within 10 years at a total investment of some $12 billion.
Based on preliminary market research performed in Japan, Canada, Germany and the USA between 1993 and 1995 (8, 9), the popular demand for tourist trips to low Earth orbit ( LEO) is potentially large enough to justify producing some 50 Kankoh-maru vehicles, on which scale this activity could be self-financing.
Anyone in sufficiently good health to ride on a scheduled airline flight could make a short trip to and from space without any ill effects on their health, and without training (unless they were required to play some role in the vehicle's operation). If there was ever any doubt about this, the orbital flight by 77 year-old US Senator John Glenn in October 1998 eliminated it.
These results have recently been endorsed in general terms by NASA (10), by the American Institute for Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, (11) and by independent researchers (12, 13), who confirm that commercial passenger space travel services could grow to a larger scale than all exist
บทนำ: ความเข้าใจผิดเกี่ยวกับพื้นที่ในการฉายภาพการพัฒนาในอนาคตของเศรษฐกิจโลก นักเศรษฐศาสตร์กระแสหลักไม่คาดเป็นส่วนสำคัญของกิจกรรมทางเศรษฐกิจมาเป็นเวลาหลายทศวรรษเนื่องจากพวกเขาทุกข์ทรมานจากความเข้าใจผิดสำคัญเกี่ยวกับพื้นที่กิจกรรมที่เป็นที่แพร่หลายแต่ทั้งภายนอก และภาย ใน "พื้นที่อุตสาหกรรม" ความเข้าใจผิดนี้จะจัดขึ้นยัง โดยนำประวัติศาสตร์ร่วมสมัย เช่น Samuel ฮันติงตัน (1) และฟุคุยาม่า Francis (2) โดยพูดชั้นนำร่วมสมัยเช่นอัลวิ Toffler(3) และนักวิจารณ์เศรษฐกิจรู้จักเช่น Robert Heilbroner (4) และ Jeremy Rifkin (5)(เข้าใจผิดนี้อาจบางทีเรียกว่า "พลาดเล่นเปียโน" หลังจากนวนิยายปี 1952 โดย Kurt Vonnegut (6) ผู้เขียน: อธิบายปริมาณที่เห็นได้ชัด แต่ไม่เป็นความจริงทางเศรษฐกิจในอนาคตสภาพของสหรัฐอเมริกาที่ประชากรเป็นผู้ว่างงาน ใช้ชีวิตสะดวกสบายแต่เบื่อรัฐบาล "ทำงาน" แบบแผน ในขณะที่ยอดเล็กจัดการอุตสาหกรรมสูงอัตโนมัติที่ผลิตสินค้าและบริการทุกคนได้)ความผิดพลาดที่อ้างอิงมุมมองของนักเขียนเหล่านี้ในอนาคตเป็นสมมติฐานที่คนธรรมดาไม่สามารถไปยังพื้นที่ พวกเขาเชื่อว่า มันเป็นสูตรยากรับพื้นที่ และว่า เฉพาะบุคคลที่เลือกเป็นพิเศษ มีการอบรมสามารถอยู่รอดได้ "แรงกระแทก" ของพื้นที่ท่องเที่ยว ดังนั้น พวกเขาสมมติว่า จะขนาดเล็ก trivially ขนาดพื้นที่กิจกรรม และอนาคตของมนุษย์ที่จะ Earth-bound เป็นหลักThis idea is entirely mistaken: in fact it is not very difficult to travel to space - it has been done regularly for nearly 40 years (ie since before such basic features of modern life as satellite communications, colour television, Beatles' music, the Boeing 747, oral contraceptives, credit-cards, video-cassettes, heart pacemakers, micro-computers, microwave ovens, compact discs, optical fibres, the Internet, DNA finger-printing, mobile telephones, GPS and many others); and essentially anyone can travel to and from space without any stress or ill-effects.Because of these facts, commercial space travel services can grow in future essentially without limit; and they are likely do so once private businesses start to earn profits from them, due to the very large unsatisfied demand for these services - as has recently begun to receive official recognition. This development will have a profound effect on the world economy and on human activities over the next few decades, making the visions of the future described by most economic commentators to date, including those mentioned above, seriously inaccurate.1.1 Space Tourism FeasibleThe main reason why passenger travel services to and from space are not available today is not because they are difficult or even particularly expensive to develop, at least by comparison with current government budgets for civilian space activities - but because government space agencies are not trying to develop them - although they spend $25 billion/year of taxpayers' money. As an example, the largest space agency, NASA, has the " X-33" reusable rocket under development, but it is unpiloted; its intended successor, "Venture Star", is not suitable for passenger-carrying; and it represents barely 2% of NASA's budget. Furthermore, government space agencies have never carried out market research on the demand for space travel services among the general public.Because of the lack of research on the feasibility of tourism in space, the Japanese Rocket Society ( JRS), a private organisation established in 1956, started a formal "Space Tourism Study Programme" in 1993. A series of papers and reports on the results of this work has been published (7), of which major conclusions to date include:the " Kankoh-maru" VTOL launch vehicle could carry 50 passengers to and from low Earth orbit at a price of some $25,000/passenger, and could be developed and put into commercial operation within 10 years at a total investment of some $12 billion.Based on preliminary market research performed in Japan, Canada, Germany and the USA between 1993 and 1995 (8, 9), the popular demand for tourist trips to low Earth orbit ( LEO) is potentially large enough to justify producing some 50 Kankoh-maru vehicles, on which scale this activity could be self-financing.Anyone in sufficiently good health to ride on a scheduled airline flight could make a short trip to and from space without any ill effects on their health, and without training (unless they were required to play some role in the vehicle's operation). If there was ever any doubt about this, the orbital flight by 77 year-old US Senator John Glenn in October 1998 eliminated it.These results have recently been endorsed in general terms by NASA (10), by the American Institute for Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, (11) and by independent researchers (12, 13), who confirm that commercial passenger space travel services could grow to a larger scale than all exist
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..