Wallace (2003) states that there are three personal reasons for reading: we read to survive (reading for survival), we read to learn (reading for learning), and we read for pleasure (reading for pleasure). When we teach reading to students, and try to understand their personal reasons for reading we will try to make reading process a meaningful one. For example, when we engage students in reading for learning we must not all the time carry out reading activities which have little to do with facts or opinions like what Goodman (1984) sees as „ritualistic‟. One good example of these reading activities is the reading aloud activity which Wallace (2003) finds this kind of reading activity may only have a „display‟ function rather than offering evidence of learning or reflection. However, this is what happening in most reading classes in schools. We do not employ any critical reading skills here because such an activity imposes little understanding of its content to students. Therefore, we need to minimize on such reading activity in our reading class if we want to help our students to develop critical reading skills.