Figure 2 intends to show the use that didactics of science has made of the
diversity of schools of the philosophy of science captured in the fish. From the late
1980s, interest in our discipline was mainly turned to the new philosophy of science,
especially in its historicist version, with Kuhn featuring as a main reference (cf.
Matthews 2004). Consequently, previous schools in the philosophy of science were
hastily discarded, with the argument that they represented traditional, positivistic
approaches to the study of science, of little or no use in science education. In
addition, authors publishing after Kuhn (and his supporters and opponents) were
also disregarded, mainly due to the limited background that didacticians of science
(i.e. science educators understood as academic researchers) have in recent and
contemporary philosophy of science.
Figure 2 intends to show the use that didactics of science has made of thediversity of schools of the philosophy of science captured in the fish. From the late1980s, interest in our discipline was mainly turned to the new philosophy of science,especially in its historicist version, with Kuhn featuring as a main reference (cf.Matthews 2004). Consequently, previous schools in the philosophy of science werehastily discarded, with the argument that they represented traditional, positivisticapproaches to the study of science, of little or no use in science education. Inaddition, authors publishing after Kuhn (and his supporters and opponents) werealso disregarded, mainly due to the limited background that didacticians of science(i.e. science educators understood as academic researchers) have in recent andcontemporary philosophy of science.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
