Table 3
Description of Factor 2 resulted of multiple correspondences analysis
Variable Variety V. test Coordinates C.A. C.R.
Ambulatory surgery Yes −4.27 −0.38 1.5 0.47
Diversification None −3.75 −1.60 3.6 0.30
Markets development None −3.66 −1.41 3.4 0.29
Technology evaluation Yes −3.38 −0.70 2.2 0.25
Medicine evaluation Yes −3.36 −0.36 1.2 0.27
Case-history Low −3.32 −1.01 2.6 0.24
Quality implication Between 0 and 4 −3.19 −1.80 2.9 0.23
GRDs High −2.98 −0.28 0.8 0.22
Nursery division Medium −2.92 −0.60 1.6 0.18
Discharge report Low −2.90 −1.12 2.1 0.18
Home assistance Yes −2.52 −0.60 1.4 0.15
Specific units Between 1 and 2 −2.51 −0.35 0.9 0.14
Computerization level Medium −2.46 −0.27 0.6 0.15
Segmentation None −2.45 −0.70 1.4 0.14
Patient classification system None −2.42 −0.32 0.8 0.14
Market share None −2.41 −0.73 1.4 0.13
Productivity Managers only −2.30 −0.89 1.4 0.12
Patient guide No 2.60 1.11 1.7 0.14
Positioning High 2.62 0.63 1.5 0.16
External program No 2.66 0.46 1.2 0.16
Home assistance No 2.68 0.24 0.6 0.17
Quality evaluation No 2.86 0.93 1.9 0.17
Nursery division High 2.88 0.30 0.8 0.21
GRD’s None 2.90 1.40 2.3 0.19
Waiting list None 3.00 1.28 2.5 0.21
Discharge report None 3.03 1.47 2.5 0.20
Specific units None 3.25 0.82 2.3 0.23
Technology evaluation No 3.41 0.39 1.3 0.29
Medicine evaluation No 3.44 0.71 2.4 0.27
Market share High 3.45 1.33 3.2 0.27
Productivity No 3.56 0.74 2.4 0.27
Quality implication Between 4 and 7 3.57 0.90 2.6 0.26
Computerization level Low 3.85 1.49 3.5 0.30
Epidemiology information systems None 4.09 1.75 4.4 0.37
Ambulatory surgery No 4.53 1.09 4.3 0.44
C.A., absolute contribution; C.R., relative contribution