Regarding the average fruits number per plant, in the case of the lateral shoots, there was registered a small
increase at V1 (85.1 fruits) and at the others variants no differences revealed (V2-78.1 fruits; V3-68 fruits).
The average fruits number per node, yield/plant/square meter and average fruits weight have had small variation,
but they remained in a closely values range. Thus, the mean fruits number on a nod have been between 1.5 (V3) and
1.7 (V2), while at V1 there was obtained only 1.6 fruits are present on a node.
The production have been nearly to the hybrid Mirabelle F1 yield potential, obtaining 4.5-5.6 kg/plant and 9-11
kg/m2. However, as we can see, at V2 and V3, where shoots removal have been done at 1 m and 1.2 m, yield was
lower. The fruits have been harvested only from the main stem (Table 4). Average fruit weight was maintained in a
narrow range, 66 to 67 g.
Regarding the average fruits number per plant, in the case of the lateral shoots, there was registered a smallincrease at V1 (85.1 fruits) and at the others variants no differences revealed (V2-78.1 fruits; V3-68 fruits).The average fruits number per node, yield/plant/square meter and average fruits weight have had small variation,but they remained in a closely values range. Thus, the mean fruits number on a nod have been between 1.5 (V3) and1.7 (V2), while at V1 there was obtained only 1.6 fruits are present on a node.The production have been nearly to the hybrid Mirabelle F1 yield potential, obtaining 4.5-5.6 kg/plant and 9-11kg/m2. However, as we can see, at V2 and V3, where shoots removal have been done at 1 m and 1.2 m, yield waslower. The fruits have been harvested only from the main stem (Table 4). Average fruit weight was maintained in anarrow range, 66 to 67 g.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
