Nanotechnology is an emerging technology poised to benefit
society both technically and socially, but as with any new advance, there is
potential risk. This paper describes a novel deliberative exercise involving
nanotechnology that engages the public in debate regarding the funding of
nanotechnology-related research while also discussing potential risks and
benefits of this emerging field of science. In a 2-h time frame, participants are
provided with general background terminology and examples of advances in
nanotechnology in 10 different research areas. The participants are then
asked to reach consensus on how the funding should be distributed among
these 10 areas. Overall, we found that participants gained factual knowledge
and confidence in their knowledge. They valued learning about nanotechnology
and the opportunity to discuss a real-world relevant topic with
others.