When it comes to causing controversy and creating quite a stir, few topics are as polarizing and anger inducing as human cloning. At one time human cloning was seen as a profound achievement in the field of biology, but that is no longer the opinion of some. Human cloning has quickly become a topic that is extremely controversial and starts debate all over the world. Coming to an agreement on the issue of human cloning is not easy. However, a deeper understanding of this issue can lead to some clarity. Taking a look at human cloning from both sides and comparing the pros against the cons allows for a different perspective.
What is Human Cloning?
Some of the controversy and differing opinion involving human cloning can be due to the complexity of this issue. Human cloning is not something that is easily understood or explained. It is a very complex process that involves a variety of different elements. In basic terms, human cloning is essentially the process of making a genetically identical copy of a human. Not only is human cloning the creation of a copy of a person, but it is also used to describe the creation of copied cells or tissue of any individual. It is easier to understand the process of human cloning when you compare it to the process that takes place when human twins are conceived. However, the main difference is that the birth of human twins is seen as a natural practice, but human cloning is seen as artificial in nature.
There are basically two different groups of human cloning that have been identified. Human reproductive cloning is the term used to describe the process that takes place when a human clone is created. Therapeutic cloning is slightly different and involves the process of cloning human cells for use in medical research. Each type is seen as a form of cloning, but they are classified differently.
When it comes to causing controversy and creating quite a stir, few topics are as polarizing and anger inducing as human cloning. At one time human cloning was seen as a profound achievement in the field of biology, but that is no longer the opinion of some. Human cloning has quickly become a topic that is extremely controversial and starts debate all over the world. Coming to an agreement on the issue of human cloning is not easy. However, a deeper understanding of this issue can lead to some clarity. Taking a look at human cloning from both sides and comparing the pros against the cons allows for a different perspective.What is Human Cloning?Some of the controversy and differing opinion involving human cloning can be due to the complexity of this issue. Human cloning is not something that is easily understood or explained. It is a very complex process that involves a variety of different elements. In basic terms, human cloning is essentially the process of making a genetically identical copy of a human. Not only is human cloning the creation of a copy of a person, but it is also used to describe the creation of copied cells or tissue of any individual. It is easier to understand the process of human cloning when you compare it to the process that takes place when human twins are conceived. However, the main difference is that the birth of human twins is seen as a natural practice, but human cloning is seen as artificial in nature.There are basically two different groups of human cloning that have been identified. Human reproductive cloning is the term used to describe the process that takes place when a human clone is created. Therapeutic cloning is slightly different and involves the process of cloning human cells for use in medical research. Each type is seen as a form of cloning, but they are classified differently.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
