Participants rated 16 product scenarios that were systematically varied on the four
within-subject variables.
The product scenarios systematically varied on price (two levels: high price, low price), brand equity (two levels: well-known brand, unknown brand), cruelty (two levels: animal tested, not animal tested), and environmental impact (two levels: produced with a high or low carbon footprint).
The 16 scenarios were randomised to avoid any order
effects. The 16 product scenarios were laid out in the following
way: ‘A moisturiser costs £4.99 [low cost]/£34.99 [high cost]
and is sold by a brand that is/is not very well known. It has/
has not been tested on animals and the manufacturer has a
high/low carbon footprint.’ The prices of the product were based
on the highest and lowest prices in the daily moisturiser market
of the UK (February 2012).
Participants rated 16 product scenarios that were systematically varied on the fourwithin-subject variables. The product scenarios systematically varied on price (two levels: high price, low price), brand equity (two levels: well-known brand, unknown brand), cruelty (two levels: animal tested, not animal tested), and environmental impact (two levels: produced with a high or low carbon footprint).The 16 scenarios were randomised to avoid any ordereffects. The 16 product scenarios were laid out in the followingway: ‘A moisturiser costs £4.99 [low cost]/£34.99 [high cost]and is sold by a brand that is/is not very well known. It has/has not been tested on animals and the manufacturer has ahigh/low carbon footprint.’ The prices of the product were basedon the highest and lowest prices in the daily moisturiser marketof the UK (February 2012).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..