During the course of the restatement process, we concluded that the estimated economic life used for classifying leases for the
majority of our products should have been five years versus the three to four years we previously utilized. This resulted from an
in-depth review of our lease portfolios, for all periods presented, which indicated that the most frequent term of our lease
contracts was 60 months. We believe that this has been and is representative of the period during which the equipment is expected
to be economically usable, with normal repairs and maintenance, for the purpose for which it was intended at the inception of the
lease. As a consequence, many shorter duration leases did not meet the criteria of SFAS No. 13 to be accounted for as sales-type
leases. Additionally, other lease arrangements were found to not meet other requirements of SFAS No. 13 for treatment as salestype
leases. As a consequence $74 and $160 of equipment revenue recorded during the two years ended December 31, 2000 and
1999, respectively, have been reversed and we have recognized additional rental revenue of $131 and $100, which represents the
impact of changing the classification of previously recorded sales-type leases to operating leases. The net cumulative reduction in
revenue, as a result of this change was $3 for the two-year period ended December 31, 2000.