relation is “exercises sovereignty over.” In the social contract
state, the people must be both sovereign and subject.
In Rousseau, three things seem to be inseparable: freedom
(nondomination), the absence of differentiated roles, and a
very tight common purpose. We must all be dependent on
the general will, lest there arise bilateral forms of dependence.
28 This has been the formula for the most terrible
forms of homogenizing tyranny, starting with the Jacobins
and extending to the totalitarian regimes of our century. But
even where the third element of the trinity is set aside, the
aligning of equal freedom with the absence of differentiation
has remained a tempting mode of thought. Wherever it
reigns, be it in modes of feminist thought or of liberal politics,
the margin to recognize difference is very small.
relation is “exercises sovereignty over.” In the social contract
state, the people must be both sovereign and subject.
In Rousseau, three things seem to be inseparable: freedom
(nondomination), the absence of differentiated roles, and a
very tight common purpose. We must all be dependent on
the general will, lest there arise bilateral forms of dependence.
28 This has been the formula for the most terrible
forms of homogenizing tyranny, starting with the Jacobins
and extending to the totalitarian regimes of our century. But
even where the third element of the trinity is set aside, the
aligning of equal freedom with the absence of differentiation
has remained a tempting mode of thought. Wherever it
reigns, be it in modes of feminist thought or of liberal politics,
the margin to recognize difference is very small.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..