Further to our meeting this morning, I am attaching the occupation grouping for what is in iConnect obtained from RO. At first glance the list in iConnect is much shorter, suggesting that there was a grouping together of occupation classes. Checking with the team that was here in the earlier days, the iConnect grouping was done in a very short time thus there is a possibility of a mismatch between the paper and iConnect final list. As agreed, K. Natvipa will go through the list in detail and highlight the outcome so we can close the operation action item from SCM (next update due on the 28th, suggest this is completed by next Friday).
In addition to that, here’s the list of items that I have so far where behaviours on paper cannot be the same as with iConnect. Suggest that this is communicated officially to distributors so that any variance/errors captured in future can be fed back directly to them for action. Please feel free to revise some of the wordings if I got the terminology wrong.
Further to our meeting this morning, I am attaching the occupation grouping for what is in iConnect obtained from RO. At first glance the list in iConnect is much shorter, suggesting that there was a grouping together of occupation classes. Checking with the team that was here in the earlier days, the iConnect grouping was done in a very short time thus there is a possibility of a mismatch between the paper and iConnect final list. As agreed, K. Natvipa will go through the list in detail and highlight the outcome so we can close the operation action item from SCM (next update due on the 28th, suggest this is completed by next Friday). In addition to that, here’s the list of items that I have so far where behaviours on paper cannot be the same as with iConnect. Suggest that this is communicated officially to distributors so that any variance/errors captured in future can be fed back directly to them for action. Please feel free to revise some of the wordings if I got the terminology wrong.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
