I conclude where I began this paper, invoking the spirit of multidisciplinarity/
interdisciplinarity that is reflected in the critical and comparative review of articles
related to management and its history that have been written from the perspective of
different disciplines rather than, necessarily, that of the management historian. Some
of the articles appear to reaffirm each other’s insights and provide a basis for
“triangulation,” while others offer disparate views that, in turn, provide a basis for a
comprehensive, or at least multifaceted, appreciation of the subject matter at hand.
Management
history in other
places
191