The implementation process of the proposed productivity loss prevention and
improvement tools has justified the fact that there is a potential for a considerable
improvement of tool time and productivity performances. The process has also
provided measures to reveal some of the likely process deficiencies well in advance,
helping the project team to plan and be prepared. Given the limited scope in the
implementation process and the moderate commitment and support extended from the
company management, around 10% of consistent and stable increase in tool time
performance carries a lot more potential in real terms. 10% increase in tool time
experienced on the selected activities within the implementation period accounts for
more than 15%-20% possible increase in productivity performance as per the past
research experience. Liu and Ruwanpura (2007) had experimentally proved the
positive relationship between tool time and productivity.ers.Proposed processes, tools and techniques provide the construction industry with
much needed, standard and structured productivity improvement approach which had
not been common within the conventional project management industry. While the
CPIO role adds objectivity in productivity improvement tasks, associated processes,
tools and techniques, defines the boundaries, responsibilities and road map of the
process. Proposed approach possibly makes a new platform for productivity
improvement in a construction site by streamlining the ad-hoc measures, tools and
techniques that are currently being practiced in the industry.
Realistic implementation of the proposed total system should start at the initial
planning stage of the project. Productivity analysis of each individual activity and
process should be well planned in advance and verified prior to the execution with
updated information of the activity inputs. Early involvement of sub trades and
suppliers are also a critical factor for the success of the proposed system. Early
involvement and proper awareness of these parties on the implementation can prevent
possible resistance and assure more support from them in the process. Success criteria
of the process implementation were primarily measured in terms of tool time
improvement. However it is recommended that the real impact should be measured
by measuring the productivity improvement of the activities.
The implementation process of the proposed productivity loss prevention and improvement tools has justified the fact that there is a potential for a considerable improvement of tool time and productivity performances. The process has also provided measures to reveal some of the likely process deficiencies well in advance, helping the project team to plan and be prepared. Given the limited scope in the implementation process and the moderate commitment and support extended from the company management, around 10% of consistent and stable increase in tool time performance carries a lot more potential in real terms. 10% increase in tool time experienced on the selected activities within the implementation period accounts for more than 15%-20% possible increase in productivity performance as per the past research experience. Liu and Ruwanpura (2007) had experimentally proved the positive relationship between tool time and productivity.ers.Proposed processes, tools and techniques provide the construction industry with much needed, standard and structured productivity improvement approach which had not been common within the conventional project management industry. While the CPIO role adds objectivity in productivity improvement tasks, associated processes, tools and techniques, defines the boundaries, responsibilities and road map of the process. Proposed approach possibly makes a new platform for productivity improvement in a construction site by streamlining the ad-hoc measures, tools and techniques that are currently being practiced in the industry. Realistic implementation of the proposed total system should start at the initial planning stage of the project. Productivity analysis of each individual activity and process should be well planned in advance and verified prior to the execution with updated information of the activity inputs. Early involvement of sub trades and suppliers are also a critical factor for the success of the proposed system. Early involvement and proper awareness of these parties on the implementation can prevent possible resistance and assure more support from them in the process. Success criteria of the process implementation were primarily measured in terms of tool time improvement. However it is recommended that the real impact should be measured by measuring the productivity improvement of the activities.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..