Overall, there were negligible effects on FM (Figure 2a). For %BF, post hoc comparisons yielded no significant differences between training groups (p = 0.633) when adjusting for baseline values; 2MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 27.5% ± 1.0%) versus CON (mean ± SD: 28.8% ± 1.4%; p = 0.145), or 1MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 27.8% ± 1.9%) versus CON (p = 0.276) (Figure 2c). For LM, post hoc comparisons yielded no significant difference between 2MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 69.5 ± 3.4 kg) and 1MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 71.6 ± 3.2) (p = 0.898), and no significant difference between 2MIN-HIIT and CON (mean ± SD: 71.0 ± 5.4 kg) (p = 0.751) or 1MIN-HIIT and CON (p = 0.811) (Figure 2b). However, 2MIN-HIIT yielded an average 2.1 kg increase in LM, and 1MIN-HIIT resulted in an average 1.7 kg increase, compared to an average 0.4 kg decrease in LM for the CON, when compared to baseline values.
 
Overall, there were negligible effects on FM (Figure 2a). For %BF, post hoc comparisons yielded no significant differences between training groups (p = 0.633) when adjusting for baseline values; 2MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 27.5% ± 1.0%) versus CON (mean ± SD: 28.8% ± 1.4%; p = 0.145), or 1MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 27.8% ± 1.9%) versus CON (p = 0.276) (Figure 2c). For LM, post hoc comparisons yielded no significant difference between 2MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 69.5 ± 3.4 kg) and 1MIN-HIIT (mean ± SD: 71.6 ± 3.2) (p = 0.898), and no significant difference between 2MIN-HIIT and CON (mean ± SD: 71.0 ± 5.4 kg) (p = 0.751) or 1MIN-HIIT and CON (p = 0.811) (Figure 2b). However, 2MIN-HIIT yielded an average 2.1 kg increase in LM, and 1MIN-HIIT resulted in an average 1.7 kg increase, compared to an average 0.4 kg decrease in LM for the CON, when compared to baseline values.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
