The vote on independence is taking place without any of the usual factors that drive the dissolution of great nations: no war, no acute economic crisis, no raging territorial dispute. In fact, the situation is quite the opposite: peace, a slowly recovering economy and a central government in London that promises to grant more powers over taxing and spending to the Scottish Parliament.
The Scots cannot claim they have not been warned about the uncertain and even dire economic consequences of splitting from the United Kingdom, on issues like the currency, investment, pensions and declining energy revenues from the North Sea.
Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE
People casting their votes at a polling station in Edinburgh on Thursday morning.Scotland Residents Head to the Polls for Independence VoteSEPT. 18, 2014
London Repeats Offer of New Powers if Scotland Votes NoSEPT. 16, 2014
A BP oil platform in the North Sea, about 100 miles east of Aberdeen, Scotland. The country’s oil infrastructure is aging, pushing up maintenance costs and driving down revenue.Independence Movement’s Energy Wager Could Prove Risky for ScotlandSEPT. 16, 2014
Economists normally as ideologically disparate and disputatious as Alan Greenspan, Paul Krugman, Adam S. Posen and Niall Ferguson all have predicted a negative economic outlook for an independent Scotland, while expressing anxiety, too, about the impact of such uncertainty on the larger European and global economies.