Writing in the fall 2008 issue of the Stanford Social Innovation Review, James A. Phills Jr., Kriss Deiglmeier, and Dale T. Miller, in “Rediscovering Social Innovation,” take a strikingly different view of social value. These authors broaden the domain of inquiry from social entrepreneurship to “social innovation,” which they define as
follows: “A novel solution to a social problem that is more effective, efficient, sustainable, or just than existing solutions and for which the value created accrues primarily to society as a whole rather than private individuals.” This view of value creation puts a great deal of weight on the difference between social and private problems to be solved on one hand, and the social and private value created as a consequence of novel solutions on the other.
Writing in the fall 2008 issue of the Stanford Social Innovation Review, James A. Phills Jr., Kriss Deiglmeier, and Dale T. Miller, in “Rediscovering Social Innovation,” take a strikingly different view of social value. These authors broaden the domain of inquiry from social entrepreneurship to “social innovation,” which they define asfollows: “A novel solution to a social problem that is more effective, efficient, sustainable, or just than existing solutions and for which the value created accrues primarily to society as a whole rather than private individuals.” This view of value creation puts a great deal of weight on the difference between social and private problems to be solved on one hand, and the social and private value created as a consequence of novel solutions on the other.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
