Conclusion
The results of this research the results from many survey researches done previously
in several countries, as mentioned in introduction part. The results on the use of management accounting techniques indicated that traditional management accounting techniques were used more
than advanced management accounting techniques. Thai SMEs who applied for advisory support
from the public sector for investment advice and upgrading of management capability. As called
“ITB” in this research and Thai SMEs who did not applied for advice, as called “Non-ITB mentioned
Similar techniques that were unknown to them but mentioned techniques they knew but never used
differently. Top five techniques that they knew and intended to use were still traditional management
accounting techniques. However Non-ITB knew and intended to use some advanced management
accounting techniques such as benchmarking and balanced scorecard, which were the tools for planning, controlling, and implementing the corporate strategies. The results showed significant association between business characteristic , as being ITB or Non-ITB, with almost all management accounting techniques, except standard costing, job order costing, process costing, and keizen costing. The barriers that that SMEs encountered were a lack of proper accounting system and accounting having insufficient knowledge in management accounting. Finally , the research results showed that top five of management accounting technique adopted by both Thai public companies and Thai SMEs were still traditional management accounting techniques.
ConclusionThe results of this research the results from many survey researches done previously in several countries, as mentioned in introduction part. The results on the use of management accounting techniques indicated that traditional management accounting techniques were used morethan advanced management accounting techniques. Thai SMEs who applied for advisory supportfrom the public sector for investment advice and upgrading of management capability. As called“ITB” in this research and Thai SMEs who did not applied for advice, as called “Non-ITB mentionedSimilar techniques that were unknown to them but mentioned techniques they knew but never useddifferently. Top five techniques that they knew and intended to use were still traditional managementaccounting techniques. However Non-ITB knew and intended to use some advanced managementaccounting techniques such as benchmarking and balanced scorecard, which were the tools for planning, controlling, and implementing the corporate strategies. The results showed significant association between business characteristic , as being ITB or Non-ITB, with almost all management accounting techniques, except standard costing, job order costing, process costing, and keizen costing. The barriers that that SMEs encountered were a lack of proper accounting system and accounting having insufficient knowledge in management accounting. Finally , the research results showed that top five of management accounting technique adopted by both Thai public companies and Thai SMEs were still traditional management accounting techniques.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
