One of the more important and frequent resource allocation problems faced by decision makers in
daily life is the allocation of time across competing activities or tasks. An important example of this
arises when, in the process of study, learners are confronted with the problem of deciding how to
allocate time to a variety of items. This requires that the learner make ongoing judgments regarding
the extent to which individual items have been learned and, based on these judgments, to control
subsequent allocations of time. These two components–monitoring and control–constitute the
general framework of metacognition (Nelson and Narens, 1990, 1994). The processes of monitoring
and control result in the allocation of study time, spacing decisions, testing decisions, in addition
to other strategies of study. In this paper, we focus on the metacognitive control of time allocation.
One of the more important and frequent resource allocation problems faced by decision makers indaily life is the allocation of time across competing activities or tasks. An important example of thisarises when, in the process of study, learners are confronted with the problem of deciding how toallocate time to a variety of items. This requires that the learner make ongoing judgments regardingthe extent to which individual items have been learned and, based on these judgments, to controlsubsequent allocations of time. These two components–monitoring and control–constitute thegeneral framework of metacognition (Nelson and Narens, 1990, 1994). The processes of monitoringand control result in the allocation of study time, spacing decisions, testing decisions, in additionto other strategies of study. In this paper, we focus on the metacognitive control of time allocation.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..