Our findings need to be interpreted in light of various limitations. One important lim- itation is that our experimental exercise abstracts from reality. The use of generic performance measures (A, B, C, etc.), for instance, provides for experimental control but lacks realism. Also, our instructions precluded participants from revisiting the evaluation of a division once they moved on to the evaluation of a different division. This approach explicitly controls the manner in which participants review divisional performance by having all participants proceed in the same sequential manner. However, the approach does not mirror real-world settings in which evaluators can compare the BSCs of multiple divisions without restriction. Future research should extend analysis to less controlled, but more realistic settings. Additional studies, for instance, can determine the extent to which BSC organization and ambiguity intolerance influence evaluator comfort levels with actual performance measures.