condition 4. Table 5 presents the results for the perpendicular tensile tests. It can be noted that all the values were satisfactory when compared to Brazilian standard, which specifies the minimum value of tensile of 0.35 MPa. The statistical results performed suggest conditions 2 and 3 are equivalents to conditions 1 and 4, but these are different from each other. Conditions 1 and 4 being statistically different, it seems that increasing the IPW content in the panel, the results will really decrease. For static bending tests, as seen in Table 6, only the condition 4 (12% of IPW) didn't meet the values specified by NBR14810:2[18], that establishes a minimum expected value of 16.1 MPa. All others conditions investigated were coherent with the standard. Condition 3 was statistically equivalent to 1, 2 and 4. Conditions 1 and 2 were statistically equivalents, but different comparing to condition 4. The range 4 to 8% of IPW content showed properties results that satisfied the specifications from NBR14810:2[18]. Just the condition 4, with 12% of IPW showed problems related to water absorption, thickness swelling and static bending. A comprehensive analysis form the statistical analysis performed confirms these claims.