Then, we may infer its duration from the number of things we remem-ber having occurred, assuming that the more things that took place, the longer it probably took. In this case, therefore, we might infer that the interesting dinner party lasted longer than the boring one. Moreover, if events of longer duration are perceived to be less enjoyable ( Sackett, Meyvis, Nelson, Converse, & Sackett, 2010), we might even infer that the interesting party was less fun than the one we had initially consid-ered to be boring! In short, the number of events that compose an experience can have opposite effects on estimates of its duration, and judgments of the experience itself, when these estimates are made after a delay than when they are made immediately.
Then, we may infer its duration from the number of things we remem-ber having occurred, assuming that the more things that took place, the longer it probably took. In this case, therefore, we might infer that the interesting dinner party lasted longer than the boring one. Moreover, if events of longer duration are perceived to be less enjoyable ( Sackett, Meyvis, Nelson, Converse, & Sackett, 2010), we might even infer that the interesting party was less fun than the one we had initially consid-ered to be boring! In short, the number of events that compose an experience can have opposite effects on estimates of its duration, and judgments of the experience itself, when these estimates are made after a delay than when they are made immediately.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..