. In this case, fermentation with FC was complete, while the immobilized cells fermented both substrates in shorter fermentation times compared to 5◦C (Fig. 3).Observing Figs. 2 and 3, it can be concluded that the overall effect of cell immobilization on the fermentation kinetics at 10◦C was smaller compared to that at 5◦C, and it was more obvious as the concentration of initial sugar increased. Fig. 4 illustrates the kinetics of glucose fermentation by FC and immobilized cells at 10◦C,showing faster fermentation rates during the first hours of the process, while the final outcome (times for completion of fermentation, residual sugar and ethanol yields) was similar compared to maltose fermentation. These results show that immobilization on TC increases the glycolytic activity of the yeast and the rate of the alcoholic fermentation as previously discussed [15]. Comparing the results of maltose fermentation at 5◦C and 10◦C with FC and immobilized cells, it can be concluded that the lower the fermentation temperature, the higher the effect of yeast immobilization