Participants and scope
As discussed above, public financial support of national
plans has been uniform within all areas of knowledge in
mobility and networking. Therefore, it may be relevant
to compare different areas of knowledge to determine
possible differences in good practices developed for
these specific areas.
Likewise, according to the concept of collaboration used
in this study, the participants’ data in this study have been
collected by associations of Spanish researchers abroad
(SRUK/CERU, CERFA, ACES and ECUSA) since these
associations are interested in scientific collaboration with
Spain, as discussed above. Each association has its own
checklist consisting of members and other Spanish
researchers worldwide related to the association. The
associations’ total population comprises 2,060 Spanish
researchers abroad [34], of which 268 scientists (13%)
responded our questionnaire.
From January 13th to March 15th, 2014, these associations
contributed to circulating the questionnaire by email
to Spanish researchers abroad. Approximately every
14 days, study researchers consulted the associations with
regards to the number of answers obtained. With this
information, these associations kept on sending this questionnaire
by email. Additionally, the associations used
their Facebook and social networks (SRUK/CERU, CERFA
and ECUSA) to obtain a higher response rate [35]. At the
beginning of March, the latest email and calls to social
networks were sent. Since then, responses scarcely increased.
The questionnaire closed on March 15th, 2014.
All participants provided informed consent, as embedded
in the questionnaire, to participate in the study and the
authors of this study did not interact with the participants
in any way. Completion of the questionnaire was voluntary
and anonymous.
Participants and scopeAs discussed above, public financial support of nationalplans has been uniform within all areas of knowledge inmobility and networking. Therefore, it may be relevantto compare different areas of knowledge to determinepossible differences in good practices developed forthese specific areas.Likewise, according to the concept of collaboration usedin this study, the participants’ data in this study have beencollected by associations of Spanish researchers abroad(SRUK/CERU, CERFA, ACES and ECUSA) since theseassociations are interested in scientific collaboration withSpain, as discussed above. Each association has its ownchecklist consisting of members and other Spanishresearchers worldwide related to the association. Theassociations’ total population comprises 2,060 Spanishresearchers abroad [34], of which 268 scientists (13%)responded our questionnaire.From January 13th to March 15th, 2014, these associationscontributed to circulating the questionnaire by emailto Spanish researchers abroad. Approximately every14 days, study researchers consulted the associations withregards to the number of answers obtained. With thisinformation, these associations kept on sending this questionnaireby email. Additionally, the associations usedtheir Facebook and social networks (SRUK/CERU, CERFAand ECUSA) to obtain a higher response rate [35]. At thebeginning of March, the latest email and calls to socialnetworks were sent. Since then, responses scarcely increased.The questionnaire closed on March 15th, 2014.All participants provided informed consent, as embeddedin the questionnaire, to participate in the study and theauthors of this study did not interact with the participantsin any way. Completion of the questionnaire was voluntaryand anonymous.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..