The use of the term ‘original’ does promote particular images, namely, that authors create from nothing, that what is created is done through a synthesis of original thoughts unique to the particular creator. This use of ‘original’ in statute creates an image of ‘original genius’, which is totally unsupported by the case law. Its use promotes the notion of ‘romantic’ authorship and provides the author with total praise for his or her creation, ignoring the many influences that act on creators every single day