Glenn Cohen tackles the issue of transplant tourism. He decorticates various traditional arguments made in the literature about the moral wrongness of the global sale of organs, paying particular attention to the corruption argument. Most traditional objections, he argues, are not substantiated. For Cohen, the strongest ethical argument for the prohibition of transplant tourism draws on evidence that informed consent is often lacking — a very substantial number of seller/ donors subsequently regret their donation. Cohen further discusses a variety of potential international and national legal interventions. In addition to hard and soft international legal instruments, domestic law reform can, according to Cohen, decrease transplant tourism. Destination countries can increase enforcement of prohibitions on organ sales. Home countries can give extraterritorial application to their prohibitions on organ sales, disallow health insurance coverage for follow-up medication and treatment, and require doctors to report suspected transplant tourists. Home countries can also use legal tools to increase the domestic organ supply.