Guns. Everywhere guns Let me start this b discussion pointing out that I am not anti-gun. I'm pro knife. Consider the merits of the knife no In the first place, you have to catch up with someone to stab him. A general substitution of knives for guns would promote physical fitness. We 'd turn into a whole nation of great runners. Plus, knives don't ricochet. And people are seldom killed while cleaning their knives il libertarian, I of course support the Second Amendment. And I be- A lieve it means exactly what it says: "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Fourteen-year-old boys are not part of a well-regulated militia. Mem "2 bers of wacky religious cults are not part of a well-regulated militia. Permitting unregulated citizens to have guns is destroying the security of this free state I am intrigued by the arguments of those who claim to follow the judicial doctrine of original intent. How do they know it was the dearest wish of Thomas Jefferson's heart that teenage drug dealers should cruise the cities of this nation perforating their fellow citizens with assault rifles? Channeling?! mmHni There is more hooey spread about the Second A ent. It says quite clearly that guns are for those who form part of a well-reguiated militia, i.e., the armed forces including the National Guard. The reasons for keeping them away from ne else get clearer by the day ect that i people who haven't got enough common sense to use an automobile properly. But e haven't outlawed cars yet We do, however, licensé them and their owners, restrict their use to presum ably sane and sober adults and keep track of who sells them to whom. At a mini mum, we should do the same with guns
In truth, there is no rational argument for guns in this society. This is no longer 9 a frontier nation in which people hunt their own food. It is a crowded, overwhelm ingly urban country in which letting people have access to guns is a continuing disaster. Those who want guns-whether for target shooting, hunt rattlesnakes (get a hoe) should be subjected to the same restrictions placed on gun owners in England, a nation in which liberty has survived nicely without an armed populace The argument that "guns don't kill people is patent nonsense. Anyone who 10 has ever worked in a cop shop knows how many family arguments end in murder a gun in the house. Did the gun kill someone? No. But if there because there was had been no gun, no one would have died. At least not without a good footrace first Guns do kill. Unlike cars, that is all they do Michael Crichton makes an interesting argument about technology in his 11 thriller Jurassic Park. He points out that power without discipline is making this society into wreckage. By the time someone who studies the martial arts becomes a master literally able to kill with bare hands that person has also undergone years of training and discipline. But any fool can pick up a gun and kill with it "A well-regulated militia" surely implies both long training and long disci-12 line. That is the least, the very least, that should be required of those who are per mitted to have guns, because a gun is literally the power to kill. For years, I used to enjoy taunting my gun-nut ends about their psychosexual hangups-always in a spirit of good cheer, you understand. But letting the noisy minority in the National Rifle Association force us to allow this carnage to continue is just plain insane I do think gun nuts have a power hangup. I don't know what is missing in 13 their psyches that they need to feel they have the power to kill. But no sane society would allow this to continue Ban the damn things. Ban them all You want protection? Get a dog
ปืน ทุกปืนผมเริ่มสนทนา b นี้ชี้ให้เห็นว่า ผมไม่ต่อต้านปืน ฉันมีด pro พิจารณาข้อดีของมีดไม่แรก คุณต้องทันคนแทงเขา การทดแทนมีดกับปืนทั่วไปจะส่งเสริมสมรรถภาพทางกาย เราจะเปิดในประเทศทั้งหมดของรอบชิงชนะเลิศดี พลัส มีดไม่ ricochet และคนถูกฆ่าตายแทบขณะซัก libertarian il ของมีด แน่นอนสนับสนุนแก้ไขสอง และฉันจะ-lieve เป็นหมายความว่า สิ่งที่มันกล่าวว่า: "อาสาห้องควบคุมจำเป็นเพื่อความปลอดภัยของรัฐอิสระ ด้านขวาของคน และยกแขนจะไม่สามารถ infringed เด็กชายอายุสิบสี่ปีไม่เป็นส่วนหนึ่งของอาสาที่ห้องควบคุม หน่วยความจำ "bers 2 ของศาสนาลัทธิแปลกประหลาดไม่อยู่อาสาห้องควบคุม อนุญาตให้มีปืนประชาชนขนบคือทำลายความปลอดภัยของรัฐอิสระนี้ฉันฉันประหลาดใจ โดยอาร์กิวเมนต์ที่อ้างว่า ทำตามคำสอนที่ยุติธรรมของเจตนาเดิม พวกเขารู้ได้อย่างไรก็ต้องสายของ Thomas Jefferson หัวใจว่า ค้ายาเสพติดของวัยรุ่นควรล่องเมืองของประเทศนี้ของประชาชนเพื่อนกับไรเฟิลจู่โจม perforating เจาะ mmHni มีการแพร่กระจาย hooey เพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับที่สองการเอนท์ มันกล่าวว่า ค่อนข้างชัดเจนว่า เป็นปืนที่ฟอร์มของอาสาดี reguiated เช่น กองทัพรวมทั้งรักษาชาติ เหตุผลทำให้พวกเขาจากมุอื่นได้ชัดเจน โดยวัน ect ที่ไอคนไม่มีสามัญสำนึกพอจะใช้รถยนต์อย่างถูกต้อง แต่อีไม่ได้ outlawed รถ แต่เราทำ อย่างไรก็ตาม licensé พวกเขาและเจ้า จำกัดการใช้ presum ผู้ใหญ่บุคคลสามารถ และเงียบขรึม และคอยที่จำหน่ายซึ่ง ที่มัมมินิ เราควรทำเช่นเดียวกันกับปืน In truth, there is no rational argument for guns in this society. This is no longer 9 a frontier nation in which people hunt their own food. It is a crowded, overwhelm ingly urban country in which letting people have access to guns is a continuing disaster. Those who want guns-whether for target shooting, hunt rattlesnakes (get a hoe) should be subjected to the same restrictions placed on gun owners in England, a nation in which liberty has survived nicely without an armed populace The argument that "guns don't kill people is patent nonsense. Anyone who 10 has ever worked in a cop shop knows how many family arguments end in murder a gun in the house. Did the gun kill someone? No. But if there because there was had been no gun, no one would have died. At least not without a good footrace first Guns do kill. Unlike cars, that is all they do Michael Crichton makes an interesting argument about technology in his 11 thriller Jurassic Park. He points out that power without discipline is making this society into wreckage. By the time someone who studies the martial arts becomes a master literally able to kill with bare hands that person has also undergone years of training and discipline. But any fool can pick up a gun and kill with it "A well-regulated militia" surely implies both long training and long disci-12 line. That is the least, the very least, that should be required of those who are per mitted to have guns, because a gun is literally the power to kill. For years, I used to enjoy taunting my gun-nut ends about their psychosexual hangups-always in a spirit of good cheer, you understand. But letting the noisy minority in the National Rifle Association force us to allow this carnage to continue is just plain insane I do think gun nuts have a power hangup. I don't know what is missing in 13 their psyches that they need to feel they have the power to kill. But no sane society would allow this to continue Ban the damn things. Ban them all You want protection? Get a dog
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..