Supplier 15 has the lowest VAR impact on the company under the examined scenarios, while Supplier 6 has the largest impact. Suppliers 1, 10, and 14 have the lowest potential percent increase (24.4 percent) and decrease (2.4 percent) in VAR. However, Supplier 10 also has the highest risk (16 percent) of suffering a disaster. This result implies that Supplier 10 has an unfavorable disaster risk probability profile when compared to those of the other study participants. In addition, this supplier also has a relatively high monthly revenue impact ($136 million) on the company. Given this result, after considering network, operational, and other external risks associated with Supplier 10, the company may find it prudent to apportion less of its business to this supplier due to its more risky disaster profile.
Supplier 15 has the lowest VAR impact on the company under the examined scenarios, while Supplier 6 has the largest impact. Suppliers 1, 10, and 14 have the lowest potential percent increase (24.4 percent) and decrease (2.4 percent) in VAR. However, Supplier 10 also has the highest risk (16 percent) of suffering a disaster. This result implies that Supplier 10 has an unfavorable disaster risk probability profile when compared to those of the other study participants. In addition, this supplier also has a relatively high monthly revenue impact ($136 million) on the company. Given this result, after considering network, operational, and other external risks associated with Supplier 10, the company may find it prudent to apportion less of its business to this supplier due to its more risky disaster profile.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..