There is a great deal of variability in the
methods employed in research on the effects
of soft drink consumption, and some of these
methodological factors have considerable effects
on study outcomes. First, we found that
effect magnitudes were consistently larger
when studies involved more powerful designs
(i.e., findings from experimental studies were
consistently stronger than those from crosssectional
studies). Second, effect sizes varied
significantly depending on other methodological
variables such as participant gender, participant
age, and beverage type. This heterogeneity
not only influences research outcomes
but also influences the conclusions that can be
drawn from a given study. Different research
methods and different definitions of key variables
such as body weight further complicate
interpretation of findings across studies. Future
research with more uniform methodology
(ideally experimental designs) would help clarify
the impact of soft drink consumption on
nutrition and health outcomes.
There is a great deal of variability in themethods employed in research on the effectsof soft drink consumption, and some of thesemethodological factors have considerable effectson study outcomes. First, we found thateffect magnitudes were consistently largerwhen studies involved more powerful designs(i.e., findings from experimental studies wereconsistently stronger than those from crosssectionalstudies). Second, effect sizes variedsignificantly depending on other methodologicalvariables such as participant gender, participantage, and beverage type. This heterogeneitynot only influences research outcomesbut also influences the conclusions that can bedrawn from a given study. Different researchmethods and different definitions of key variablessuch as body weight further complicateinterpretation of findings across studies. Futureresearch with more uniform methodology(ideally experimental designs) would help clarifythe impact of soft drink consumption onnutrition and health outcomes.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
