In view of the limited extent of the contribution, off the wide spectrum of our study, we are offering only the results (the interested readers are encouraged to contact the authors for further discussions). As assumed, the research has proven that women are holders of positions at lower levels of managements. In the middle-management they are represented by as high as 65.52%, whereas top-level management is dominated mostly by men – in our case 40.91% men against 10.34 % of women. The question is why is it so? Why do women hold lower-level positions? Compared to men, they have the same ambitions to be in higher positions, in the top-management (such was the conclusion of the research conducted by McKinsaey & Company in 2013). Why do women hold lower-level positions, when in view of the 45.10% of respondents (39.25% of them declare: I do not know) ideas of women could be contributively for the economy? And, thirdly, why do women hold lower-level managerial positions? As much as 96% of the respondents agreed that women have the necessary qualities and capabilities for achieving managerial positions. The majority of the respondents presuppose that the reason for inequality is in the traditional role of women – as mothers – and the consequent responsibilities regarding their families and households. As confirmed by 80.39% of managers, family is neglected to larger extent when a managerial post is held by women than by a man. For example, a maternity leave resulting in a loss of experiences during the given period of time makes it more difficult for a woman to resume her previous working routines. Apart from it, women themselves become less interested in such positions, for similar reasons. On a global scale, many research findings share almost the same point of view regarding the issue of a harmonization work with family, i.e. women loaded by the traditional role of mother.