Dear K.Kanne
Cc. K.Seng,
Thank you for the non-conform report. Please refer to the below message we gave to Dole.
QUOTE
For preventive action, please kindly refer to WH "Non Conformance Report" as per the attached file kub. In summary;
1. Root cause:
- Customer service chose dispatch SKU and created "pick slip" without double checking against Dole dispatch plan in email
- WH checker picked cargo based on customer service "pick slip" without double checking with Dole's plan (email)
2. Preventive action:
- Customer service prints out Dole's dispatching plan from email and keeps as reference while creating picking slip
- Customer service double checks the picking slip against Dole's email before release the plan to picker/checker
- Customer service to also give Dole's plan (email) together with picking slip to picker/checker for double checking purpose during the picking process
- Checker to cross check the "picked cargo" against picking slip and Dole's plan (email) again before start loading.
3. Timeline: start immediately
UNQUOTE
Referring to PCS NC, please note that “there will not be an additional process of email confirmation by Damco after PCS creates picking slip. PCS should be responsible for double checking the picking slip against the given plan (Dole’s email). In case PCS has question, Damco will be available to answer question, but not to confirm every picking slip via email.
And as discussed previously, in creating pick-slip process, customer service needs to choose cargo by taking into account the SKU, lot number, cargo physical status, QA status etc. The QA status also relates to the sample result provided by Dole via email (with RMDI# as reference). PCS customer service has to update QA status in the inventory report as well and ensure that PCS will not pick cargo that QA status is still pending/ reject/ hold. Please confirm your acknowledgement and that PCS customer service also understands this process well