Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients
with gallbladder and bile duct stones
Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, Furlan N, Ragona R, Garbarini A
Record Status
This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstract
contains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the
reliability of the study and the conclusions drawn.
Health technology
The study compared classic sequential treatment with the laparoendescopic rendezvous technique in patients with
gallbladder and bile duct stones. Classic sequential treatment was preoperative endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy
(LC). The laparoendoscopic rendezvous technique was preoperative ERCP and ES during LC.
Type of intervention
Treatment.
Economic study type
Cost-effectiveness analysis.
Study population
The study population comprised patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and suspected common bile duct (CBD)
stones, who had been admitted to a department of general surgery at a university hospital. The exclusion criteria
included:
patients with acute cholangitis or necrotising pancreatitis;
under 18 years of age;
ASA IV and V;
suspected CBD malignancy;
previous cholecystectomy;
contraindications and/or absence of compliance with the diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures, including magnetic
resonance cholangiography (MRC) and ECRP;
contraindications to laparoscopic surgery such as glaucoma, pulmonary emphysema and left heart failure; and
patients treated by total or partial gastric resection.
Setting
The setting was inpatient tertiary care. The economic study was carried out at the II Division of General Surgery of the
University of Turin, Italy
Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patientswith gallbladder and bile duct stonesMorino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, Furlan N, Ragona R, Garbarini ARecord StatusThis is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each abstractcontains a brief summary of the methods, the results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on thereliability of the study and the conclusions drawn.Health technologyThe study compared classic sequential treatment with the laparoendescopic rendezvous technique in patients withgallbladder and bile duct stones. Classic sequential treatment was preoperative endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC). The laparoendoscopic rendezvous technique was preoperative ERCP and ES during LC.Type of interventionTreatment.Economic study typeCost-effectiveness analysis.Study populationThe study population comprised patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and suspected common bile duct (CBD)stones, who had been admitted to a department of general surgery at a university hospital. The exclusion criteriaincluded:patients with acute cholangitis or necrotising pancreatitis;under 18 years of age;ASA IV and V;suspected CBD malignancy;previous cholecystectomy;contraindications and/or absence of compliance with the diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures, including magneticresonance cholangiography (MRC) and ECRP;contraindications to laparoscopic surgery such as glaucoma, pulmonary emphysema and left heart failure; andpatients treated by total or partial gastric resection.SettingThe setting was inpatient tertiary care. The economic study was carried out at the II Division of General Surgery of theUniversity of Turin, Italy
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
