Finally, a career interview based on a biographical questionnaire (BQ) that the candidate
completes prior to the assessment center was conducted. It assists assessors to develop a
greater understanding of the candidate’s self-development orientation, his/her track record
of accomplishments or achievements, exposure to leadership roles, aspirations and vision
for his/her future career. All this information is integrated with the rest of the assessment data
to form a holistic picture of the candidate’s overall development potential.
The findings
The output of the talent review provided individual snapshots (time-based) of the individuals’
profiles, as evaluated against the company’s leadership competency framework, a
multi-level talent map as well as feedback reports that were discussed individually with each
participant. In addition, a further critical output component of the talent review process was
the risk analysis of the information, where the performance implications or business impact
of each particular individual’s profile was highlighted and communicated to management. It
transpired that the sample’s strategic thinking ability and leadership skills are generally weak
and that the current leadership capabilities might not be aligned with the company’s growth
strategy. The sample population had very high and often unrealistic aspirations and they
placed a high premium on executive education.
Figure 3 illustrates the candidate distribution by competency strength and gives a clear
indication of their individual competency profiles as evaluated against the company’s
leadership competency framework.
The talent map in Figure 2 depicts the distribution of talent within the target group. It is
evident that 61 percent of the candidates have mastery potential, 30 percent growth
potential and only 9 percent of the candidates have turn potential suggesting that they are
ready to be promoted to the next management level. This information is critical for
succession management since it demonstrates the need for development interventions as
well as the fact that the company might be at risk due to a lack of ‘‘ready now’’ successors.
An additional outcome of the talent review is the identification of the future stars, high flyers, key performers as well as achievers within the organization which is important for the
development of a leadership pipeline.
It should be noted that a positive leniency rating error in the job performance ratings is
suspected and this situation provides further support for talent reviews as a very effective
intervention in circumstances where there might be a lack of valid and reliable performance
data.
Finally, a career interview based on a biographical questionnaire (BQ) that the candidate
completes prior to the assessment center was conducted. It assists assessors to develop a
greater understanding of the candidate’s self-development orientation, his/her track record
of accomplishments or achievements, exposure to leadership roles, aspirations and vision
for his/her future career. All this information is integrated with the rest of the assessment data
to form a holistic picture of the candidate’s overall development potential.
The findings
The output of the talent review provided individual snapshots (time-based) of the individuals’
profiles, as evaluated against the company’s leadership competency framework, a
multi-level talent map as well as feedback reports that were discussed individually with each
participant. In addition, a further critical output component of the talent review process was
the risk analysis of the information, where the performance implications or business impact
of each particular individual’s profile was highlighted and communicated to management. It
transpired that the sample’s strategic thinking ability and leadership skills are generally weak
and that the current leadership capabilities might not be aligned with the company’s growth
strategy. The sample population had very high and often unrealistic aspirations and they
placed a high premium on executive education.
Figure 3 illustrates the candidate distribution by competency strength and gives a clear
indication of their individual competency profiles as evaluated against the company’s
leadership competency framework.
The talent map in Figure 2 depicts the distribution of talent within the target group. It is
evident that 61 percent of the candidates have mastery potential, 30 percent growth
potential and only 9 percent of the candidates have turn potential suggesting that they are
ready to be promoted to the next management level. This information is critical for
succession management since it demonstrates the need for development interventions as
well as the fact that the company might be at risk due to a lack of ‘‘ready now’’ successors.
An additional outcome of the talent review is the identification of the future stars, high flyers, key performers as well as achievers within the organization which is important for the
development of a leadership pipeline.
It should be noted that a positive leniency rating error in the job performance ratings is
suspected and this situation provides further support for talent reviews as a very effective
intervention in circumstances where there might be a lack of valid and reliable performance
data.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""